Gavaskar vs the West Indies pace attack: what the scorecards show

08 October 2026 · 5 min read · by Cricket Analyst

Watch on YouTube: All-Time India Test XI: Can It Beat Australia & West Indies?

Sunil Gavaskar facing the great West Indies fast bowlers is one of cricket's most retold stories. Here is what the scorecards say, and just as important, what they cannot say.

This analysis was prepared for our All-Time India Test XI video (above), which discusses Gavaskar's record against West Indies.

Key findings

  • 1,975 runs at 53.38, with 9 hundreds, in the 23 Tests where at least one of Roberts, Holding, Garner, Marshall, Clarke or Croft was in the West Indies XI.
  • 29 of his 37 dismissals in those Tests came from the six: Holding 11, Marshall 8, Clarke 5, Roberts 3, Garner 2.
  • 61.14 in India, 42.00 in the West Indies in the same set of Tests.
  • Leave out 1978-79 and the average falls to 42.86. In that series only Clarke and Marshall of the six were in the XI.
  • In the 7 Tests with three or more of the six together he averaged 49.60, more than Chappell (29.67), Border (40.43), Gower (32.17) or Miandad (25.89) managed in the same situation.
  • Limits: this is scorecard-level data. "In the XI" does not mean "bowled at him," and no verdict on who was better is claimed.

The question

How did Gavaskar score in Tests where at least one of six West Indies fast bowlers was in the opposing XI: Andy Roberts, Michael Holding, Joel Garner, Malcolm Marshall, Sylvester Clarke and Colin Croft?

The method, and its limits

This is scorecard-level analysis, not ball-by-ball. Three rules matter before you read any number:

  • "In the XI" does not mean "bowled at him." A bowler counts if he was in the opposing XI. These figures are Gavaskar's runs in those Tests, not runs scored off those bowlers.
  • Matches are identified by ESPNcricinfo match ID, not by names typed in from memory.
  • Who dismissed him comes from his list of dismissals on ESPNcricinfo. Of his 37 dismissals in these Tests, all 37 are known.

All figures come from ESPNcricinfo Statsguru pages saved by hand and parsed locally. Croft never played a Test with Gavaskar, so he appears in the list but contributes nothing.

The headline numbers

Gavaskar in Tests where any of the six played
Tests 23
Innings 40 (3 not out)
Runs 1,975
Average 53.38
Hundreds 9 (highest 236*)
Fifties / ducks 4 / 5
India's results in those Tests won 2, lost 9, drawn 12

For comparison, all of his Tests against West Indies add up to 27 Tests, 2,749 runs at 65.45 with 13 hundreds. The gap is explained by four Tests in 1971 in which none of the six played: 774 runs at 154.80 in 8 innings. Those four Tests are a small sample, but they lift the overall record well above what he did against the six.

Home and away

Tests Runs Average Hundreds
In India 14 1,345 61.14 6
In the West Indies 9 630 42.00 3

Away from home, against the six, he averaged 42.00, with 13 of his 15 dismissals there coming from them.

Who got him out

Of his 37 dismissals in these Tests, 29 came from the six:

Bowler Dismissals of Gavaskar Tests together Gavaskar's average in those Tests
Michael Holding 11 15 45.40
Malcolm Marshall 8 14 51.14
Sylvester Clarke 5 5 98.86 *
Andy Roberts 3 11 46.94
Joel Garner 2 4 36.83 *
Colin Croft 0 0 none

* Fewer than 10 innings, so treat as a small sample. These Test counts overlap: a Test with Holding and Marshall both in the XI appears in both rows, so the rows cannot be added together.

Holding is the standout: 11 of the 29, in 15 Tests together.

When several of them played together

Situation Tests Innings Runs Average
Three or more of the six in the XI 7 12 496 49.60
Holding and Marshall both in the XI 11 20 745 41.39
Roberts, Holding, Garner and Marshall all in the XI 4 7 221 36.83

In those four Tests with the main four together, all 6 of his dismissals were to those four. That is only 7 innings, so it is a pattern worth noting, not a conclusion.

One series changes the picture

Leave out the 1978-79 series in India and the numbers change a lot:

Tests Innings Runs Average Hundreds
All 23 Tests 23 40 1,975 53.38 9
Without 1978-79 17 31 1,243 42.86 5
1978-79 only 6 9 732 91.50 4

In 1978-79, only Clarke and Marshall of the six were in the XI. So a large part of the "against the fearsome six" average comes from a series in which most of them did not play. That is the strongest reason to read the headline 53.38 with care.

How other batters compare

The same filter, applied to four other great batters of the era:

Batter Tests Runs Average Hundreds Average with 3+ of the six in the XI
Sunil Gavaskar 23 1,975 53.38 9 49.60 (7 Tests)
Greg Chappell 12 1,058 58.78 4 29.67 (6 Tests)
Allan Border 26 1,754 40.79 2 40.43 (12 Tests)
David Gower 19 1,149 32.83 1 32.17 (12 Tests)
Javed Miandad 12 600 27.27 1 25.89 (5 Tests)

Chappell's overall average is higher than Gavaskar's, but it falls to 29.67 in the Tests where three or more of the six played together. Gavaskar holds up best in that harder setting, at 49.60. Samples are small, so this describes what the scorecards show, not a verdict.

What this does not prove

  • It does not measure how he played any single bowler. For that you would need ball-by-ball data, which does not exist for this era.
  • It does not show a bowler bowled at him just because he was in the XI.
  • It does not settle who was "better." Averages depend on pitches, conditions, opposing attacks and context that the scorecards do not capture.

Sources

Data: ESPNcricinfo Statsguru, saved and parsed locally, checked against ESPNcricinfo's printed career figures. Analysis, tables and conclusions are our own. See the data sources page.

Data from ESPNcricinfo, analysed independently. See data sources.

Related videos

Watch the full breakdowns

Every analysis here has a video version on the Cricket Analyst YouTube channel, with the charts, the arguments and the debate.

Subscribe on YouTube Browse the channel

Get new research by email

One email when a new analysis is published. No spam, unsubscribe any time. Your address is used only for this newsletter (see the privacy policy).

More research